Terms Unconditional

Consumer Apps · Productivity/Utility (search, email, cloud, Android, ads) · Private litigation

Google / Alphabet

Headline

A 2025 lawsuit alleges Google's Chrome browser secretly builds a unique 'fingerprint' of CHILDREN specifically, one that keeps working even after a school administrator disables cookies or turns on anti-tracking tools…

Not independently verified. Verification status: Unverified - heuristic first draft. Publish state: draft unverified.

A 2025 lawsuit alleges Google's Chrome browser secretly builds a unique 'fingerprint' of CHILDREN specifically, one that keeps working even after a school administrator disables cookies or turns on anti-tracking tools — with that fingerprint allegedly feeding Google's own ad products and getting sold onward to other education-technology companies. Separately, and far more serious: in March 2026, the father of a 36-year-old Florida man filed what was reported as the first wrongful-death lawsuit targeting Google's Gemini AI chatbot (federal court, San Jose), alleging prolonged conversations with the chatbot contributed to his adult son's death by suicide following a mental health crisis — the case remains in early litigation and the allegations are unproven, but it sits alongside a separate 2025 suit (Robby Starbuck) alleging Gemini generated and spread false, seriously damaging claims about a real person to millions of users. Given the sensitivity of these specific matters, this entry deliberately stays at the level of the documented legal filings rather than describing the alleged content itself. All of this comes as Google pours unprecedented capital into AI development, which shareholder advocates argue is FAR outpacing any corresponding growth in privacy safeguards.

  • SeveritySeverity 3 of 5, not independently verified. A 2025 lawsuit alleges Google's Chrome browser secretly builds a unique 'fingerprint' of CHILDREN specifically, one that keeps working even after a school administrator disables cookies or turns on anti-tracking tools…
  • Evidence tierUnassigned
  • Claims confirmedNo sourced claims yet
  • Last verified2026-08-04

Case status. Private litigation; no sources are on file yet, so no legal tier is assigned.

Primary source. None recorded — Unverified - heuristic first draft.

Last verified 96 days agoverified 96 days ago0180 days
Freshness. Last verified 96 days ago (2026-08-04); stale after 180 days.

Terms

Arbitration

Not independently confirmed this pass for Google's own consumer Terms of Service — standard binding arbitration + class action waiver expected industry-wide, though note many of the above cases proceeded as class actions/government suits rather than individual arbitration, suggesting either opt-outs, government-suit exceptions (governments generally aren't bound by consumer arbitration clauses), or claims that predate/exceed the scope of Google's arbitration terms.

Data sharing

LIKELY THE LARGEST TOTAL LEGAL/REGULATORY EXPOSURE OF ANY COMPANY IN THIS ENTIRE 185-COMPANY AUDIT: (1) $1.375 BILLION settlement with Texas (2025) — a settlement that Texas says 'far eclipses' any other single-state settlement against Google for similar claims (next-largest: $93 million); (2) €2.95 BILLION EU antitrust fine (2025) for distorting competition in ad-tech; (3) a 2024 settlement requiring Google to DESTROY BILLIONS of data records after being sued for secretly tracking users who believed they were browsing privately in Chrome's Incognito mode, plus letting Incognito users block third-party cookies for 5 years; (4) a March 26, 2026 court-approved settlement (In re Google RTB Consumer Privacy Litigation, N.D. Cal.) resolving claims that Google shared personal data with third parties through Real-Time Bidding ad auctions — an injunctive-relief-only settlement (a new user control to limit RTB data sharing plus enhanced disclosures) with no money paid to class members beyond named plaintiffs; (6) 2 federal DOJ antitrust liability rulings finding Google illegally maintained monopolies in BOTH general search (2024) AND ad-tech markets (April 2025) — the search case is on appeal by Google, with the DOJ and states cross-appealing that the September 2025 remedies (which stopped short of ordering a Chrome divestiture) didn't go far enough; the ad-tech case's remedies and appeal status were not confirmed this pass.

Fees and billing

Google Ads customers and Google Play Store purchasers have separately been reported to be eligible for antitrust/app-store-fee settlement funds distinct from the privacy cases above (combined amounts and eligibility periods not verified this pass).

Contacts

Privacy contact. dpo-google@google.com (primary route is the Google privacy help form)

Legal notice. PUBLIC COMPANY (GOOGL). Service route: c/o General Counsel / Corporate Secretary, Mountain View, California — the corporate address on the SEC Form 10-K cover page is the official address of record. Confirm the exact street address on the current 10-K at sec.gov/edgar, and check the state-of-incorporation registered agent (usually Delaware; most large filers use The Corporation Trust Company or Corporation Service Company) via the Secretary of State business-entity search. A registered agent MUST accept service, which is why it is the reliable channel when a company publishes no privacy address.

Mailing address. Google LLC, Attn: Data Protection, 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

Written channel present
Paper trail: written. Written channel present.

Evidence

No claims have been itemized for this row yet.

No sources are on file for this row yet.

Source vault

Link status: Candidate - not yet fetched

DocumentLast fetchPDF
Privacy policy
policies.google.com/privacy
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Terms of service
policies.google.com/terms
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Website
abc.xyz
Not fetched yet—
Primary source
No URL recorded
Verification: Unverified - heuristic first draft
Not fetched yet—

Enforcement

No enforcement actions are linked to this row.

State statute

Headquarters on file: California. Provisions of CCPA/CPRA on file:

ProvisionTypeSource
Right to Deletion
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.105
hardsource
Right to Correction
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.106
hardsource
Right to Know / Access
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.110
hardsource
Right to Limit Use of Sensitive Personal Information
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.121; Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, § 7027
hardsource
Right to Data Portability
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.130(a)(3)(B)(iii)
hardsource
Privacy Policy / Privacy Notice Requirements
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.130(a)(5); Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, § 7011
hardsource
Sensitive Personal Information — Categories
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140(ae)
hardsource
Service Provider and Contractor Contract Requirements
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140(ag); Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, § 7051
hardsource
Applicability Threshold (2025 CPI-Adjusted)
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140(d)
thresholdsource
Privacy Risk Assessment — Mandatory for High-Risk Processing (Eff. Jan. 1, 2026)
Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185(a)(15); Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, §§ 7150-7157
hardsource
Right to Opt Out of Sale or Sharing
Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.120, 1798.135
hardsource
Sale vs. Sharing Distinction
Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.140(ad), 1798.140(ah)
hardsource
Enforcement — CPPA and AG; Civil Penalties (2025 CPI-Adjusted)
Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.155, 1798.199.90; Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17206
hardsource
Notice at Collection
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, § 7012
hardsource
Cybersecurity Audit — Annual Independent Audit Requirement (Eff. Jan. 1, 2026)
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, §§ 7120-7124
hardsource
Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) — Notice, Opt-Out, and Access Rights
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11, §§ 7200-7222; Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185(a)(16)
hardsource