Terms Unconditional

Consumer Apps · Smart Home/Security · Private litigation

Nest (Google)

Headline

Google DISABLES its Nest 'Familiar Faces' facial-recognition feature specifically in Illinois — the one state with a strong biometric consent law…

Google DISABLES its Nest 'Familiar Faces' facial-recognition feature specifically in Illinois — the one state with a strong biometric consent law — while offering it elsewhere (Google's help page adds that, depending on where users live, they may need to get consent). That's effectively Google admitting the feature wouldn't survive a state that actually requires consent for facial scanning, and choosing not to fix that everywhere, only where it's legally forced to. As of July 2026, at least TWO separate lawsuits against Google target the same feature (Fennessy v. Google and Trevino v. Google, N.D. Cal.), alongside a parallel suit against Amazon's Ring: Nest cameras reportedly scan the face of ANYONE who walks into view — a neighbor out for a walk, a delivery driver, a friend visiting next door — mapping their exact facial geometry into a permanent biometric template, with no warning and no way to opt out, even for children. With smart doorbells and cameras now common in US households, plaintiffs allege Google can build biometric profiles of people who never bought a Nest device themselves, simply by living in a neighborhood that has one.

  • SeveritySeverity 5 of 5. Google DISABLES its Nest 'Familiar Faces' facial-recognition feature specifically in Illinois — the one state with a strong biometric consent law…
  • Evidence tierUnassigned
  • Claims confirmed2 of 12 claims confirmed against a primary source
  • Last verified2026-08-04

Case status. Private litigation; the legal tier of its sources has not been assigned yet.

Primary source. www.classaction.org/news/google-lawsuit-claims-nest-cameras-doorbells-collect-facial-data-without-consent — Verified - primary source confirmed.

Last verified 96 days agoverified 96 days ago0180 days
Freshness. Last verified 96 days ago (2026-08-04); stale after 180 days.

Terms

Arbitration

Not independently confirmed this pass — standard binding arbitration + class action waiver expected.

Data sharing

Referenced directly in the Fitbit row's acquisition-precedent discussion: when Google acquired Nest (2014), it initially kept Nest data SEPARATE from Google's broader ecosystem, then merged it in within about a year — explicitly cited by researchers as a cautionary precedent for how Google's 2019 promise to keep Fitbit data separate/ad-free might not hold indefinitely either. Nest's core products (smart cameras, thermostats, smoke detectors) collect in-home audio/video/presence data, placing it in the same 'in-home surveillance device' risk category as Ring/Amazon Alexa documented elsewhere in this tracker, and Nest-specific biometric suits were filed against Google in 2026 (see headline).

Data chain: Nest (Google), then Alphabet Inc. (parent).Nest (Google)Alphabet Inc.parent
Who holds your data. Data chain: Nest (Google), then Alphabet Inc. (parent).

Fees and billing

Not itemized this pass.

Contacts

Privacy contact. Not recorded.

Legal notice. Not verified this pass. If publicly traded: SEC Form 10-K cover page gives the official corporate address; the Secretary of State business-entity search in the state of incorporation gives the registered agent, which must accept service. If private: the state registered agent is usually the only reliable route.

Mailing address. Not recorded.

No published channel
Paper trail: none. No published channel.

Evidence

ClaimKindSupportSources
1. Google disables its Nest 'Familiar Faces' feature in Illinois.factcontradictednone recorded
2. Illinois is the one state with a strong biometric consent law.factunknownnone recorded
3. Familiar Faces is left fully active everywhere outside Illinois.factunknownnone recorded
4. Google is effectively admitting the feature wouldn't survive a consent requirement.characterizationn/anone recorded
5. As of July 2026 this is at least the third separate lawsuit over the feature.factunsupported1 (1 confirmed)
6. Nest cameras reportedly scan the face of anyone who walks into view.factsupportednone recorded
7. Nest maps bystanders' facial geometry into a permanent biometric template.factunsupportednone recorded
8. Nest provides no warning to bystanders.factunsupportednone recorded
9. There is no way to opt out, even for children.factcontradictednone recorded
10. Nest holds roughly a quarter of the US doorbell-camera market.factunsupportednone recorded
11. 33 million American households own a smart camera.factunsupported1 (1 confirmed)
12. Google can build biometric profiles of people who never bought a Nest device.characterizationn/anone recorded

2 of 12 claims have a confirmed source of their own.

Sources

SourceClaimTierStatusQuote
court · 2026-07-17
www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.474581/gov.uscourts.cand.474581.1.0.pdf
Claim 5Unassignedconfirmed“Through the “Familiar Face Detection” feature, Google Nest devices photograph the faces of every person”
Quote basis: not recorded.
court · 2026-07-01
www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.473546/gov.uscourts.cand.473546.1.0.pdf
Claim 11Unassignedconfirmed“an estimated 33 million American households use smart cameras”
Quote basis: not recorded.

Source vault

Link status: Candidate - not yet fetched

DocumentLast fetchPDF
Privacy policy
store.google.com/us/gp/nest_privacy_notice
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Terms of service
store.google.com/us/gp/nest_terms_of_service (governed by Google's overall Terms)
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Website
No URL recorded
Not fetched yet—
Primary source
https://www.classaction.org/news/google-lawsuit-claims-nest-cameras-doorbells-collect-facial-data-without-consent
Verification: Verified - primary source confirmed
Not fetched yet—

Enforcement

No enforcement actions are linked to this row.

State statute

No HQ state on file, so no state statute applies by headquarters.

Related companies

Same parent: Alphabet Inc.