Terms Unconditional

F500 Entertainment & Leisure · Hotels, Casinos, Resorts · Structural / no discrete incident

Caesars Entertainment

Headline

Caesars was breached in 2023 through social engineering of an outsourced IT support vendor, and reporting indicates Caesars paid a substantial ransom while MGM did not - two competitors, same period, same technique…

Not independently verified. Verification status: Unverified - heuristic first draft. Publish state: draft unverified.

Caesars was breached in 2023 through social engineering of an outsourced IT support vendor, and reporting indicates Caesars paid a substantial ransom while MGM did not - two competitors, same period, same technique, opposite decisions, and neither set of customers had any say. The Caesars Rewards database exposed in that incident contained loyalty data including driver's licence and Social Security numbers for a large number of members. Casino loyalty data is a gambling-behaviour record.

  • SeveritySeverity 2 of 5, not independently verified. Caesars was breached in 2023 through social engineering of an outsourced IT support vendor, and reporting indicates Caesars paid a substantial ransom while MGM did not - two competitors, same period, same technique…
  • Evidence tierUnassigned
  • Claims confirmedNo sourced claims yet
  • Last verified2026-08-04

Primary source. None recorded — Unverified - heuristic first draft.

Last verified 96 days agoverified 96 days ago0180 days
Freshness. Last verified 96 days ago (2026-08-04); stale after 180 days.

Terms

Arbitration

Not independently confirmed this pass — standard binding arbitration + class action waiver expected for individual guest/rewards-program agreements.

Data sharing

CONFIRMED 2023 BREACH via a SOCIAL ENGINEERING attack on an OUTSOURCED IT SUPPORT VENDOR (per Caesars' Sept. 14, 2023 Form 8-K), shortly before the related MGM Resorts attack documented in this same tab; both were attributed in reporting to the Scattered Spider group: hackers stole Caesars' REWARDS-PROGRAM MEMBER DATABASE. Unlike MGM, Caesars REPORTEDLY PAID A RANSOM (reported as $15 million of a $30 million demand) to the attackers specifically to protect customer data from being publicly leaked — a real-world illustration of the 'pay to avoid disclosure' strategy, in contrast to MGM's refusal (documented in that row) which led to a more prolonged, publicly visible operational disruption. The Nevada Gaming Control Board and Nevada's governor were reported to be actively monitoring the situation given the coordinated, industry-targeted nature of both attacks.

Fees and billing

Not itemized this pass.

Contacts

Privacy contact. Not recorded.

Legal notice. Not verified this pass. If publicly traded: SEC Form 10-K cover page gives the official corporate address; the Secretary of State business-entity search in the state of incorporation gives the registered agent, which must accept service. If private: the state registered agent is usually the only reliable route.

Mailing address. Not recorded.

No published channel
Paper trail: none. No published channel.

Evidence

No claims have been itemized for this row yet.

No sources are on file for this row yet.

Source vault

Link status: Candidate - not yet fetched

DocumentLast fetchPDF
Privacy policy
caesars.com/privacy-policy
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Terms of service
caesars.com/terms-of-use
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Website
No URL recorded
Not fetched yet—
Primary source
No URL recorded
Verification: Unverified - heuristic first draft
Not fetched yet—

Enforcement

No enforcement actions are linked to this row.

State statute

No HQ state on file, so no state statute applies by headquarters.