Terms Unconditional

F500 Tech & Semiconductors · Semiconductors and Other Electronic Components · Structural / no discrete incident

Nvidia

Headline

Nvidia was named in October 2025 in a 'broken banner' tracking-consent action - the allegation being that a cookie banner presented choices that did not actually govern what the site did, so a user who declined…

Not independently verified. Verification status: Unverified - heuristic first draft. Publish state: draft unverified.

Nvidia was named in October 2025 in a 'broken banner' tracking-consent action - the allegation being that a cookie banner presented choices that did not actually govern what the site did, so a user who declined tracking was tracked anyway. That is a category worth naming precisely because it inverts the entire consent model: the interface exists, the button works, and the outcome is unchanged. Nvidia is otherwise a chip designer with minimal direct consumer data relationship - its consumer touchpoint is GeForce Experience and driver software, which does collect telemetry. Allegations, not findings; in May 2026 the court granted Nvidia's motion to compel individual arbitration and stayed the case, finding the plaintiff had notice of the terms linked from the cookie banner.

  • SeveritySeverity 2 of 5, not independently verified. Nvidia was named in October 2025 in a 'broken banner' tracking-consent action - the allegation being that a cookie banner presented choices that did not actually govern what the site did, so a user who declined…
  • Evidence tierUnassigned
  • Claims confirmedNo sourced claims yet
  • Last verified2026-08-04

Primary source. None recorded — Unverified - heuristic first draft.

Last verified 96 days agoverified 96 days ago0180 days
Freshness. Last verified 96 days ago (2026-08-04); stale after 180 days.

Terms

Arbitration

Not independently confirmed this pass — standard binding arbitration + class action waiver expected for individual consumer GeForce/software account agreements.

Data sharing

Named in an October 2025 proposed class action (Penning v. Nvidia Corp., N.D. Cal.) as facing a NEAR-IDENTICAL 'broken banner' tracking-consent lawsuit to the one documented for Dollar Tree elsewhere in this tracker (F500 Consumer Goods & Food tab) — alleging Nvidia's website continued tracking visitors even after they clicked to reject advertising cookies through a consent banner.

Fees and billing

Not itemized this pass.

Contacts

Privacy contact. Not recorded.

Legal notice. Not verified this pass. If publicly traded: SEC Form 10-K cover page gives the official corporate address; the Secretary of State business-entity search in the state of incorporation gives the registered agent, which must accept service. If private: the state registered agent is usually the only reliable route.

Mailing address. Not recorded.

No published channel
Paper trail: none. No published channel.

Evidence

No claims have been itemized for this row yet.

No sources are on file for this row yet.

Source vault

Link status: Candidate - not yet fetched

DocumentLast fetchPDF
Privacy policy
nvidia.com/en-us/about-nvidia/privacy-policy/
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Terms of service
nvidia.com/en-us/about-nvidia/privacy-policy-legacy/
Not fetched yetNO (HTML only)
Website
No URL recorded
Not fetched yet—
Primary source
No URL recorded
Verification: Unverified - heuristic first draft
Not fetched yet—

Enforcement

No enforcement actions are linked to this row.

State statute

No HQ state on file, so no state statute applies by headquarters.